Daily Luxury

Land Rover puts every model under the line in a luxury reliability ranking

Land Rover Defender 110 in Pangea Green, front three-quarter view

Luxury badges promise plenty, and reliability is meant to be the quiet part of the deal, what justifies the price after the showroom smell fades. A ranking of luxury models scored out of 100 says the promise is kept unevenly.

Road Ethos built each score from owner complaints, recalls, and repair costs across multiple model years, then ranked the brands by the share of their lineup scoring below 65, its line for weak. Seven brands earned a place in the ranking itself. Behind them, Volvo and Cadillac each carry a single weak model, and Lexus and Acura carry none at all. It doesn’t grade on a curve.

The spread is the story. One brand landed every tracked model below the line, and Lexus landed none of its seven.

Twenty models from the seven ranked brands scored below 65. The lowest model score in the ranking is the Mercedes-Benz CLA at 48. The deepest failure isn’t a model. It’s a brand.

BrandModels below 65Lowest score
Land Rover2 of 2Range Rover Sport, 57
Mercedes-Benz6 of 9CLA, 48
Lincoln2 of 3Navigator, 61
Porsche3 of 5Cayenne, 59
BMW4 of 10iX, 56
Genesis1 of 3GV70, 63
Audi2 of 9e-tron, 51

Land Rover went two for two in the wrong direction

The Land Rover Discovery. Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Land Rover is the only brand here with a perfect record, and it’s the wrong kind. Both of its tracked models sit below the line, the Range Rover Sport averaging 57 and the Defender 110 averaging 60, for a brand average of 56. The Defender is the face of the brand, the halo that sells the rest of the range, and it still couldn’t clear the bar. The scores are built across model years, not one bad batch.

None of this is a design failure. The Defender’s silhouette is the most confident shape Land Rover sells. The leak sits in the ownership math.

The newest metal does better. The 2025 Range Rover Sport scores 68, the brand’s best year, and the 2024 Defender 110 reaches 64.

ModelScore out of 100
Range Rover Sport57
Defender 11060

Mercedes-Benz has the deepest bench of weak scores

The Mercedes-Benz GLS, from the brand with six models below the line. Photo: Alexander Migl / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Six Mercedes-Benz models score below 65, more than any other brand, and all six land below 60. The CLA scores 48, the C-Class 51, the EQS 52, the A-Class 56, the E-Class 58, and the EQE 59. Sedans and electrics carry the damage. The technology load is the ranking’s own explanation, dense electronics and newer, less proven electric systems stacked into the same cars.

The other side of the ledger is the SUV range. The GLC scores 69 and the GLE 67, both clear of the line, so the safest Mercedes in this ranking is the one shaped like a truck. Repairs still average $807 a year across the lineup, and the C-Class recall load is heavy, 149 recalls on the 2021 alone.

ModelScore out of 100
GLC69
GLE67
EQE59
E-Class58
A-Class56
EQS52
C-Class51
CLA48

Lincoln’s biggest SUVs carry its weak scores

The current Lincoln Nautilus scores 72, the one Lincoln clear of the line. Photo: MercurySable99 / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Lincoln puts two of its three tracked models below the line, and both are its big three-row SUVs. The Navigator scores 61 and the Aviator 64. The Nautilus, the smaller car, clears the line at 72.

Recalls weigh on both big models, 116 issued for the Aviator and 68 for the Navigator, and Lincoln’s repair bills average $948 a year.

ModelScore out of 100
Nautilus72
Aviator64
Navigator61

Porsche puts three of five below the line

The Porsche Cayenne scores 59, the brand’s lowest mark here. Photo: M 93 / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Porsche’s weak scores don’t spare the famous names. The Cayenne scores 59, the 911 scores 61, and the Macan 63, three of the brand’s five tracked models, for a brand average of 64. There’s no single defect behind it. The ranking ties the record to complex, high-performance hardware and dense electronics, the same recipe that makes the cars fast.

Ownership costs pile on. Porsche carries the highest estimated repair bills of the brands here, $1,130 a year on average, routine maintenance and parts priced like the cars themselves. The dependable corner of the range is the Boxster, whose 2018 model year scores 71, the best single year the brand posted.

ModelScore out of 100
Macan63
91161
Cayenne59

BMW hides four weak scores inside a strong range

The BMW X5 scores 60, one of four BMWs below the line. Photo: Alexander Migl / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

BMW tracks ten models in this ranking and puts four of them under the line: the electric iX at 56, the X5 at 60, the X3 at 61, and the X6 at 63. The iX’s newer electric hardware has drawn more complaints than the gas models. The other side is real strength, the i4 at 74, the X1 at 71, and the 3 Series and X7 at 69.

The X5 is the one that stings. It’s the volume luxury SUV, the one cross-shopped against half the vehicles in this ranking, and a score of 60 is exactly the pattern a buyer meets on the lot. A shopper comparing spec sheets won’t see it. A shopper comparing ownership records will.

BMWs also average $968 a year in maintenance. The ownership record is the spec sheet nobody prints.

ModelScore out of 100
i474
X171
3 Series69
X769
X663
X361
X560
iX56

Genesis has one soft spot and little else to fix

The Genesis GV70 is its brand’s only weak score. Photo: Alexander Migl / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Genesis carries the shortest problem list of the seven. Only the GV70 falls below the line, at 63. The GV80 sits right on it at 65, which counts as clear, and the G70 scores 66, for a brand average of 65. The brand’s 10-year, 100,000-mile powertrain warranty softens the risk the scores describe.

ModelScore out of 100
G7066
GV8065
GV7063

Audi has two misses, and one runs deep

The Audi Q3 scores 74, clear of the line. Photo: Alexander Migl / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Audi tracks nine models and puts just two below the line. The original e-tron scores 51, one of the lowest marks in the ranking, and the Q8 sits at 64. The e-tron carries the record almost alone, with 106 recalls and 80.3 complaints per 10,000 vehicles sold. The newer Q8 e-tron scores 77, a different machine from the one that dragged the average down.

The rest of the range is steady. The A5 scores 76, the Q3 74, the A4 73, and the Q5 69. Of the seven ranked brands, Audi’s share of weak models is the lowest, and its repair bills still average $930 a year.

ModelScore out of 100
Q8 e-tron77
A576
Q374
A473
Q569
Q864
e-tron51

The brands with the fewest weak models

Behind the ranked seven, two brands carry a single weak model each. Cadillac’s is the Escalade at 63, its only score below the line, while the XT5, XT6, and XT4 all score in the 70s. Volvo’s is the XC40, one weak model in five, against an XC60 at 74 and an XC90 at 72.

The Cadillac CT5-V, from the brand whose only weak score is the Escalade at 63. Photo: Kevauto / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Lexus and Acura stayed clean. All seven Lexus models score 78 or higher, led by the RX at 85, the highest model score named in the ranking. Acura’s four rated models, the ZDX, RDX, TLX, and MDX, all score in the 70s or 80s, led by the ZDX at 82. Neither brand gives a shopper a weak model to dodge.

The Lexus RX leads its brand at 85. Photo: M 93 / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

That gap is what the ranking measures. Design, badge, and price are the visible half of luxury, the half showrooms sell. The other half is whether the machine keeps working in year three.

On that half, several famous names are chasing brands that never made the weak list.

ModelScore out of 100
Lexus RX85
Acura ZDX82
Volvo XC6074
Volvo XC9072
Cadillac Escalade63
Exit mobile version